Aug 28, 1. Mate in 13 for White MathsMaths0 16 min ago. Maybe this is because he is a trainer more than a practical player. Aug 29, 6. BEST endgame strategt I know of. Aug 09, Gabriel Victor added it.
|Published (Last):||3 January 2008|
|PDF File Size:||11.78 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.4 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This book - as its name implies - is about the endgame. However, it is not really about basic endgames i. It is not a book of endgame theory, but rather is a manual of how to play complex endings, or even - you could say -queenless middlegames.
Most examples begin with several sets of minor pieces, rooks; others are heavy piece endings with each side having two rooks and a queen. Thus, the book is not really covering extremely simplified positions where calculation and knowledge are key, but rather more complex positions where understanding and positional judgement are the most important factors, yet the game no longer has the "middlegame character".
The book was first published in Russian in , translated to English by Ken Neat and first published in English in Shereshevsky is an International Master from Belarus. He is mostly known as a trainer. I have another - very interesting - book by him called The Soviet Chess Conveyor. He also wrote Mastering the Endgame with Leonid Slutsky. In other words, it helps a player to better "feel" a position - who stands better and what needs to be done.
There is a huge variety in the examples. There are examples of opposite-colored bishops, rook and pawn endings, positions with each side having a minor piece and lots of pawns, heavy piece endings, and positions which are basically queenless middlegames, with all other pieces on the board and an intact pawn structure. By using archetypal examples of various kinds of endings, the author is trying to let the reader understand better the general battle lines.
There is a particular emphasis on the battle between knight and bishop. Teaching - or learning - chess is complicated. Unlike other fields, most of it is not specific knowledge. If you teach a language, for example, the student needs to know that this word means this, that the correct sentence structure is this, that the ending for, i. And then they just apply their exact knowledge. With chess, exact knowledge is only valuable in openings and theoretical endgames.
And in the case of openings, it is disputable exact knowledge, since a verdict on a specific line of play could be overturned. The student is extremely unlikely to get any of the exact same positions as are in this book in his own games. The key is for the student to improve his thinking process by seeing illustrative examples.
This would hopefully allow him to get to the heart of other positions more quickly. I first started reading it and playing over some of the examples in the fall of , I believe. Often people have said that I am not very good at endgames. I do think there is some truth to that, even if their assessment might be based on some blitz games, and not tournament games where I have more time to figure things out.
In particular, one Russian friend loved to tell me that I am terrible at endgames. I think the idea is that - since I never had a coach - I would have less understanding of the type of chess that is based on general understanding, for which a more experienced player can hand down the "tradition". Thus my chess level would be composed more of those things which are easier to learn by oneself - i. In any case, in I decided I could benefit from this book, and started looking at it more seriously.
I think it did help me to appreciate complex endings more. Some time around then I played the following game with a tough, queenless middlegame. At the time I felt it was a pretty good game and it seemed that the book had some influence on me. Any Downsides? This book is highly respected for a reason, but it is not obvious when you first see it. The comments are very terse and simple. There is not a huge amount of analysis.
Sure, you can analyze the position for yourself and learn from that, but often you will want to hear what the author would say about some other possibility. Maybe this is because he is a trainer more than a practical player. The other criticism is that a fairly large number of the examples come from very famous old games, e.
Many players will have already seen those games. And if you are under 21 in the U. More from GM BryanSmith.
"Endgame Strategy" by Mikhail Shereshevsky
All examples are taken from a real game, usually from the legends of chess such as Capablanca, Lasker, Fischer, Tal, Botvinnik, Smyslov, Karpov, Kasparov and many others. His goal is not to teach you how to win a typical position. White would like to exchange dark square bishops to weaken d4 and c5 squares even more. Be3 O-O
ENDGAME STRATEGY SHERESHEVSKY PDF
Endgame Strategy is the nonfiction, strategy and epic eBook in which the author reveals the secrets of playing the chess game. Mikhail Shereshevsky is the author of this stunning book. This is a complete guide which helps the reader to adopt the match-winning strategies. He shares the basic knowledge and the role of pawns, king and the queen in the game.